This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The p value is not sufficient for indicating the importance of the outcome of a study. The reason ... (Read 66 times)

j.rubin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
The p value is not sufficient for indicating the importance of the outcome of a study. The reason for this is because
 
  a. p values are too small.
  b. the size of the study affects the p value.
  c. the magnitude of the test statistic must also be known.
  d. effect sizes are related to p values.

Question 2

The initials NHST stand for
 
  a. Normal HypothesiS Testing.
  b. Null HypothesiS Testing.
  c. Normal Hypothesis Significance Testing.
  d. Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

dudman123

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 304
Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

d





 

Did you know?

Children with strabismus (crossed eyes) can be treated. They are not able to outgrow this condition on their own, but with help, it can be more easily corrected at a younger age. It is important for infants to have eye examinations as early as possible in their development and then another at age 2 years.

Did you know?

All adverse reactions are commonly charted in red ink in the patient's record and usually are noted on the front of the chart. Failure to follow correct documentation procedures may result in malpractice lawsuits.

Did you know?

The most common treatment options for addiction include psychotherapy, support groups, and individual counseling.

Did you know?

The immune system needs 9.5 hours of sleep in total darkness to recharge completely.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library