Author Question: In what case was it determined that a district attorney's office may not be held liable under ... (Read 61 times)

LCritchfi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 519
In what case was it determined that a district attorney's office may not be held liable under Section 1983 for failure to train prosecutors based on a single Brady violation?
 
  a. Connick v. Thompson (2011).
  b. Kalina v. Fletcher (1997).
  c. Buckley v. Fitzsimmons (1993).
  d. Burns v. Reed (1991).

Question 2

Which of the following is NOT a prison program?
 
  a. boot camp
  b. counseling
  c. recreation
  d. education



shailee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

a



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Women are 50% to 75% more likely than men to experience an adverse drug reaction.

Did you know?

Cancer has been around as long as humankind, but only in the second half of the twentieth century did the number of cancer cases explode.

Did you know?

Blood in the urine can be a sign of a kidney stone, glomerulonephritis, or other kidney problems.

Did you know?

After a vasectomy, it takes about 12 ejaculations to clear out sperm that were already beyond the blocked area.

Did you know?

More than nineteen million Americans carry the factor V gene that causes blood clots, pulmonary embolism, and heart disease.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library