Author Question: In what case was it determined that a district attorney's office may not be held liable under ... (Read 51 times)

LCritchfi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 519
In what case was it determined that a district attorney's office may not be held liable under Section 1983 for failure to train prosecutors based on a single Brady violation?
 
  a. Connick v. Thompson (2011).
  b. Kalina v. Fletcher (1997).
  c. Buckley v. Fitzsimmons (1993).
  d. Burns v. Reed (1991).

Question 2

Which of the following is NOT a prison program?
 
  a. boot camp
  b. counseling
  c. recreation
  d. education



shailee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

a



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

For high blood pressure (hypertension), a new class of drug, called a vasopeptidase blocker (inhibitor), has been developed. It decreases blood pressure by simultaneously dilating the peripheral arteries and increasing the body's loss of salt.

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

According to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, lung disease is the third leading killer in the United States, responsible for one in seven deaths. It is the leading cause of death among infants under the age of one year.

Did you know?

People about to have surgery must tell their health care providers about all supplements they take.

Did you know?

It is believed that the Incas used anesthesia. Evidence supports the theory that shamans chewed cocoa leaves and drilled holes into the heads of patients (letting evil spirits escape), spitting into the wounds they made. The mixture of cocaine, saliva, and resin numbed the site enough to allow hours of drilling.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library