Author Question: In what case was it determined that a district attorney's office may not be held liable under ... (Read 97 times)

LCritchfi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 519
In what case was it determined that a district attorney's office may not be held liable under Section 1983 for failure to train prosecutors based on a single Brady violation?
 
  a. Connick v. Thompson (2011).
  b. Kalina v. Fletcher (1997).
  c. Buckley v. Fitzsimmons (1993).
  d. Burns v. Reed (1991).

Question 2

Which of the following is NOT a prison program?
 
  a. boot camp
  b. counseling
  c. recreation
  d. education



shailee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

a



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Astigmatism is the most common vision problem. It may accompany nearsightedness or farsightedness. It is usually caused by an irregularly shaped cornea, but sometimes it is the result of an irregularly shaped lens. Either type can be corrected by eyeglasses, contact lenses, or refractive surgery.

Did you know?

Thyroid conditions cause a higher risk of fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.

Did you know?

In 1844, Charles Goodyear obtained the first patent for a rubber condom.

Did you know?

Liver spots have nothing whatsoever to do with the liver. They are a type of freckles commonly seen in older adults who have been out in the sun without sufficient sunscreen.

Did you know?

Though Candida and Aspergillus species are the most common fungal pathogens causing invasive fungal disease in the immunocompromised, infections due to previously uncommon hyaline and dematiaceous filamentous fungi are occurring more often today. Rare fungal infections, once accurately diagnosed, may require surgical debridement, immunotherapy, and newer antifungals used singly or in combination with older antifungals, on a case-by-case basis.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library