This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Based on the information provided in the text, explain what you believe is important in the case of ... (Read 43 times)

melina_rosy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 531
Based on the information provided in the text, explain what you believe is important in the case of Apprendi v. New Jersey.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

_________ refers to a style of parenting with parents who are supportive and who effectively control their children in a non-coercive way.
 
  a. Parent pathology c. Parental efficacy
  b. Low frequency parenting d. Low coercion parenting



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

meryzewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Answer to Question 1

In Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000), SCOTUS dropped the hands-off approach and brought the Constitution into the sentencing proceeding. Charles Apprendi, Jr., was convicted of possessing a firearm for an unlawful purpose, a felony in New Jersey normally punishable by 5 to 10 years in prison. New Jersey also had a hate crime statute providing for an extended punishment of 10 to 20 years if the judge found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant committed the crime with a purpose to intimidate an individual or group of individuals because of race, color, gender, handicap, religion, sexual orientation or ethnicity (469).

Apprendi argued that racial purpose was an element of the crime that required proof beyond a reasonable doubt. New Jersey argued that the choice of elements of offenses is for legislatures to make and that New Jersey's legislature chose to make racial purpose a sentencing factor.. The five-member majority agreed with Apprendi and adopted the Apprendi bright-line rule: Other than the fact of prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt (490).

Apprendi was supposed to be a ringing endorsement of the right to trial by jury (Allen and others 2005, 1718). Sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentencing laws allowed trial judges to decide facts related to defendants' punishment. According to the majority, guidelines and mandatory minimums threatened the democratic right to have our peers decide those critical facts. Apprendi was supposed to eliminate that threat.

Answer to Question 2

C




melina_rosy

  • Member
  • Posts: 531
Reply 2 on: Aug 12, 2018
Gracias!


anyusername12131

  • Member
  • Posts: 327
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

Certain rare plants containing cyanide include apricot pits and a type of potato called cassava. Fortunately, only chronic or massive ingestion of any of these plants can lead to serious poisoning.

Did you know?

More than 4.4billion prescriptions were dispensed within the United States in 2016.

Did you know?

GI conditions that will keep you out of the U.S. armed services include ulcers, varices, fistulas, esophagitis, gastritis, congenital abnormalities, inflammatory bowel disease, enteritis, colitis, proctitis, duodenal diverticula, malabsorption syndromes, hepatitis, cirrhosis, cysts, abscesses, pancreatitis, polyps, certain hemorrhoids, splenomegaly, hernias, recent abdominal surgery, GI bypass or stomach stapling, and artificial GI openings.

Did you know?

The ratio of hydrogen atoms to oxygen in water (H2O) is 2:1.

Did you know?

Acetaminophen (Tylenol) in overdose can seriously damage the liver. It should never be taken by people who use alcohol heavily; it can result in severe liver damage and even a condition requiring a liver transplant.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library