This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Based on the information provided in the text, explain what you believe is important in the case of ... (Read 84 times)

melina_rosy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 531
Based on the information provided in the text, explain what you believe is important in the case of Apprendi v. New Jersey.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

_________ refers to a style of parenting with parents who are supportive and who effectively control their children in a non-coercive way.
 
  a. Parent pathology c. Parental efficacy
  b. Low frequency parenting d. Low coercion parenting



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

meryzewe

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Answer to Question 1

In Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000), SCOTUS dropped the hands-off approach and brought the Constitution into the sentencing proceeding. Charles Apprendi, Jr., was convicted of possessing a firearm for an unlawful purpose, a felony in New Jersey normally punishable by 5 to 10 years in prison. New Jersey also had a hate crime statute providing for an extended punishment of 10 to 20 years if the judge found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant committed the crime with a purpose to intimidate an individual or group of individuals because of race, color, gender, handicap, religion, sexual orientation or ethnicity (469).

Apprendi argued that racial purpose was an element of the crime that required proof beyond a reasonable doubt. New Jersey argued that the choice of elements of offenses is for legislatures to make and that New Jersey's legislature chose to make racial purpose a sentencing factor.. The five-member majority agreed with Apprendi and adopted the Apprendi bright-line rule: Other than the fact of prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt (490).

Apprendi was supposed to be a ringing endorsement of the right to trial by jury (Allen and others 2005, 1718). Sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentencing laws allowed trial judges to decide facts related to defendants' punishment. According to the majority, guidelines and mandatory minimums threatened the democratic right to have our peers decide those critical facts. Apprendi was supposed to eliminate that threat.

Answer to Question 2

C




melina_rosy

  • Member
  • Posts: 531
Reply 2 on: Aug 12, 2018
Wow, this really help


steff9894

  • Member
  • Posts: 337
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

The first-known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used in Egypt in 2000 BC. Condoms were also reportedly used, made of animal bladders or intestines.

Did you know?

Always store hazardous household chemicals in their original containers out of reach of children. These include bleach, paint, strippers and products containing turpentine, garden chemicals, oven cleaners, fondue fuels, nail polish, and nail polish remover.

Did you know?

Many of the drugs used by neuroscientists are derived from toxic plants and venomous animals (such as snakes, spiders, snails, and puffer fish).

Did you know?

Elderly adults are living longer, and causes of death are shifting. At the same time, autopsy rates are at or near their lowest in history.

Did you know?

Stroke kills people from all ethnic backgrounds, but the people at highest risk for fatal strokes are: black men, black women, Asian men, white men, and white women.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library