This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule ... (Read 38 times)

asd123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule is in violation of the exclusionary rule, even if officers have a valid warrant to search a home.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

McCleskey v. Kemp (1987) considered whether _______ evidence was sufficient to demonstrate the presence of racial discrimination in the application of the death penalty.
 
  Fill in the blank(s) with correct word



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

kjohnson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Answer to Question 1

FALSE

Answer to Question 2

statistical





 

Did you know?

In most climates, 8 to 10 glasses of water per day is recommended for adults. The best indicator for adequate fluid intake is frequent, clear urination.

Did you know?

According to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, lung disease is the third leading killer in the United States, responsible for one in seven deaths. It is the leading cause of death among infants under the age of one year.

Did you know?

Earwax has antimicrobial properties that reduce the viability of bacteria and fungus in the human ear.

Did you know?

It is difficult to obtain enough calcium without consuming milk or other dairy foods.

Did you know?

Asthma is the most common chronic childhood disease in the world. Most children who develop asthma have symptoms before they are 5 years old.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library