This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule ... (Read 74 times)

asd123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule is in violation of the exclusionary rule, even if officers have a valid warrant to search a home.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

McCleskey v. Kemp (1987) considered whether _______ evidence was sufficient to demonstrate the presence of racial discrimination in the application of the death penalty.
 
  Fill in the blank(s) with correct word



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

kjohnson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Answer to Question 1

FALSE

Answer to Question 2

statistical





 

Did you know?

It is difficult to obtain enough calcium without consuming milk or other dairy foods.

Did you know?

Bacteria have been found alive in a lake buried one half mile under ice in Antarctica.

Did you know?

The U.S. Pharmacopeia Medication Errors Reporting Program states that approximately 50% of all medication errors involve insulin.

Did you know?

Parkinson's disease is both chronic and progressive. This means that it persists over a long period of time and that its symptoms grow worse over time.

Did you know?

Everyone has one nostril that is larger than the other.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library