Author Question: In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule ... (Read 82 times)

asd123 · **on:** Aug 13, 2018

In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule is in violation of the exclusionary rule, even if officers have a valid warrant to search a home.

a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

McCleskey v. Kemp (1987) considered whether _______ evidence was sufficient to demonstrate the presence of racial discrimination in the application of the death penalty.

Fill in the blank(s) with correct word

kjohnson · **Reply #1 on:** Aug 13, 2018

Answer to Question 1

FALSE

Answer to Question 2

statistical

asd123 · **Reply #2 on:** Aug 13, 2018

TY

kjohnson · **Reply #3 on:** Aug 13, 2018

You're welcome

Author Question: In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule ... (Read 82 times)

asd123

In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule ...

Related Topics

Need homework help now?

kjohnson

In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule ...

asd123

In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule ...

kjohnson

In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule ...