This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Give examples of a person who can consent to a search for someone else. Explain the difference ... (Read 29 times)

jc611

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Give examples of a person who can consent to a search for someone else. Explain the difference between actual and apparent authority to consent for another person.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Describe a search incident to a pretext arrest, and explain its significance.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

fauacakatahaias

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 353
Answer to Question 1

The law gives examples of situations where one person can consent to a search for someone else. (1) One lover consents to a search of the room shared with the other lover. (2) One roommate consents to a search of an entire apartment shared with another roommate. (3) A homeowner consents to a search of a room that a house guest occupies. (4) A joint user of luggage consents to a search of the shared luggage. (5) A high school principal consents to a search of a high school student's locker. (6) A factory manager consents to a search of items on top of an employee's workbench.

Actual authority to consent for another person exists when, in fact, one person has legal authority to consent for someone else to a search by police of the other person's house or possessions.

Apparent authority exists when one person does not, in fact, have legal authority to consent to police searching another's house or possessions but, based on the circumstances, the police reasonably believe that the consenting person does have the actual authority.

Answer to Question 2

A pretext stop or arrest occurs when police officers use the objective basis for one event, commonly a traffic offense, as a means to do a search or an investigation for a more serious crime that the officers believe the stopped individual may have committed, but for which they do not have probable cause.

For example, police officers may believe that a driver has drugs in a car. However, they do not have probable cause to search the car for drugs. The police could follow the car until the driver commits a traffic violation and then stop the car for this. If the state law allows, they could then arrest the driver for the traffic violation and conduct a search incident to lawful arrest of the car's interior, pursuant to New York v. Belton. If the search turns up drugs, then the driver would be arrested for that more serious offense.




jc611

  • Member
  • Posts: 552
Reply 2 on: Aug 13, 2018
Gracias!


parker125

  • Member
  • Posts: 332
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

More than 30% of American adults, and about 12% of children utilize health care approaches that were developed outside of conventional medicine.

Did you know?

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or MRSA was discovered in 1961 in the United Kingdom. It if often referred to as a superbug. MRSA infections cause more deaths in the United States every year than AIDS.

Methicilli ...
Did you know?

Congestive heart failure is a serious disorder that carries a reduced life expectancy. Heart failure is usually a chronic illness, and it may worsen with infection or other physical stressors.

Did you know?

Patients should never assume they are being given the appropriate drugs. They should make sure they know which drugs are being prescribed, and always double-check that the drugs received match the prescription.

Did you know?

Cutaneous mucormycosis is a rare fungal infection that has been fatal in at least 29% of cases, and in as many as 83% of cases, depending on the patient's health prior to infection. It has occurred often after natural disasters such as tornados, and early treatment is essential.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library