According to the Supreme Court in Michigan v. Sitz, involving ...

[bobbysung]

According to the Supreme Court in Michigan v. Sitz, involving sobriety checkpoints, detaining a car briefly at a sobriety check point:
 
  a. is not a stop.
  b. is a stop, but it is not covered by the Fourth Amendment.
  c. is a stop to which the Fourth Amendment applies.
  d. requires probable cause to think that someone in the car has committed a crime.

Question 2

According to the Supreme Court's opinion in U.S. v. Montoya de Hernandez, involving the detention of a traveler at the border, the standard of evidence necessary to detain a traveler at the border, beyond the scope of a routine custom search and inspection is:
 
  a. probable cause.
  b. no evidence at all, the Fourth Amendment does not apply at the border.
  c. a clear indication of illegal activity.
  d. reasonable suspicion.

[xMRAZ]

Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

d

[bobbysung]

Gracias!

[aliotak]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it