Author Question: In Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), the Court held that a state capital sentencing procedure ... (Read 56 times)

Alygatorr01285

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
In Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), the Court held that a state capital sentencing procedure that permitted the sentencing judge to make the factual determination of the aggravating and mitigating circumstances present
 
  a. violated the Sixth Amendment's right of trial by jury
  b. violated the Sixth Amendment's right of trial by judge
  c. violated the Sixth Amendment's right to a speedy trial
  d. violated the Eight Amendment's right to freedom from cruel and unusual punishment

Question 2

Reentry has been described as a transient state between liberty and recommitment..
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



BUTTHOL369

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

TRUE



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

In 2010, opiate painkllers, such as morphine, OxyContin®, and Vicodin®, were tied to almost 60% of drug overdose deaths.

Did you know?

In 2006, a generic antinausea drug named ondansetron was approved. It is used to stop nausea and vomiting associated with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy.

Did you know?

After 5 years of being diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, one every three patients will no longer be able to work.

Did you know?

All adverse reactions are commonly charted in red ink in the patient's record and usually are noted on the front of the chart. Failure to follow correct documentation procedures may result in malpractice lawsuits.

Did you know?

Asthma occurs in one in 11 children and in one in 12 adults. African Americans and Latinos have a higher risk for developing asthma than other groups.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library