In Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), the Court held that a ...

[Alygatorr01285]

In Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), the Court held that a state capital sentencing procedure that permitted the sentencing judge to make the factual determination of the aggravating and mitigating circumstances present
 
  a. violated the Sixth Amendment's right of trial by jury
  b. violated the Sixth Amendment's right of trial by judge
  c. violated the Sixth Amendment's right to a speedy trial
  d. violated the Eight Amendment's right to freedom from cruel and unusual punishment

Question 2

Reentry has been described as a transient state between liberty and recommitment..
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

[BUTTHOL369]

Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

TRUE