Author Question: In which case did the Court rule that probationers were entitled to an attorney during the ... (Read 73 times)

waynest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
In which case did the Court rule that probationers were entitled to an attorney during the revocation process?
 
  a. Morrisey v. Brewer
  b. Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  c. Minnesota v. Murphy
  d. Mempa v. Rhay

Question 2

Peter believes that his crime was justified because his girlfriend deceived him when she told him she was 19 . What legal justification defense does Peter possibly have?
 
  a. duress
  b. entrapment
  c. necessity
  d. none of these



rachel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

d



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Your heart beats over 36 million times a year.

Did you know?

If you could remove all of your skin, it would weigh up to 5 pounds.

Did you know?

Always store hazardous household chemicals in their original containers out of reach of children. These include bleach, paint, strippers and products containing turpentine, garden chemicals, oven cleaners, fondue fuels, nail polish, and nail polish remover.

Did you know?

Today, nearly 8 out of 10 pregnant women living with HIV (about 1.1 million), receive antiretrovirals.

Did you know?

Amoebae are the simplest type of protozoans, and are characterized by a feeding and dividing trophozoite stage that moves by temporary extensions called pseudopodia or false feet.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library