Author Question: In which case did the Court rule that probationers were entitled to an attorney during the ... (Read 65 times)

waynest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
In which case did the Court rule that probationers were entitled to an attorney during the revocation process?
 
  a. Morrisey v. Brewer
  b. Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  c. Minnesota v. Murphy
  d. Mempa v. Rhay

Question 2

Peter believes that his crime was justified because his girlfriend deceived him when she told him she was 19 . What legal justification defense does Peter possibly have?
 
  a. duress
  b. entrapment
  c. necessity
  d. none of these



rachel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

d



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Most women experience menopause in their 50s. However, in 1994, an Italian woman gave birth to a baby boy when she was 61 years old.

Did you know?

You should not take more than 1,000 mg of vitamin E per day. Doses above this amount increase the risk of bleeding problems that can lead to a stroke.

Did you know?

Certain rare plants containing cyanide include apricot pits and a type of potato called cassava. Fortunately, only chronic or massive ingestion of any of these plants can lead to serious poisoning.

Did you know?

Looking at the sun may not only cause headache and distort your vision temporarily, but it can also cause permanent eye damage. Any exposure to sunlight adds to the cumulative effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation on your eyes. UV exposure has been linked to eye disorders such as macular degeneration, solar retinitis, and corneal dystrophies.

Did you know?

Thyroid conditions may make getting pregnant impossible.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library