Author Question: In which case did the Court rule that probationers were entitled to an attorney during the ... (Read 67 times)

waynest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
In which case did the Court rule that probationers were entitled to an attorney during the revocation process?
 
  a. Morrisey v. Brewer
  b. Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  c. Minnesota v. Murphy
  d. Mempa v. Rhay

Question 2

Peter believes that his crime was justified because his girlfriend deceived him when she told him she was 19 . What legal justification defense does Peter possibly have?
 
  a. duress
  b. entrapment
  c. necessity
  d. none of these



rachel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

d



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

There are more sensory neurons in the tongue than in any other part of the body.

Did you know?

For high blood pressure (hypertension), a new class of drug, called a vasopeptidase blocker (inhibitor), has been developed. It decreases blood pressure by simultaneously dilating the peripheral arteries and increasing the body's loss of salt.

Did you know?

Essential fatty acids have been shown to be effective against ulcers, asthma, dental cavities, and skin disorders such as acne.

Did you know?

Bacteria have been found alive in a lake buried one half mile under ice in Antarctica.

Did you know?

Addicts to opiates often avoid treatment because they are afraid of withdrawal. Though unpleasant, with proper management, withdrawal is rarely fatal and passes relatively quickly.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library