This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Why didn't the green revolution in the 1960s and 1970s work like it should ... (Read 89 times)

Charlie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
Why didn't the green revolution in the 1960s and 1970s work like it should have?

Question 2

You are in the supermarket with your mother and notice they now sell irradiated ground beef. Your mother tells you to stay away from it because it is radioactive and dangerous. What would you tell her to convince her otherwise?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

zhanghao

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

Governments can learn from recent history the importance of developing local agricultural technology. A major effort made in the 1960s and 1970sthe green revolutiondemonstra ted the potential for increased grain production in Asia. It was an effort to bring the agricultural technology of the industrial world to the developing countries, but the high-yielding strains of wheat and rice that were selected required irrigation, chemical fertilizers, and pesticidesall costly and beyond the economic means of too many of the farmers in the developing world.

Instead of transplanting industrial technology into the developing countries, small, efficient farms and local structures for marketing, credit, transportation, food storage, and agricultural education should be developed. International research centers need to examine the conditions of tropical countries and orient their research toward appropriate technology: labor-intensive rather than energy-intensive agricultural methods. For example, labor-intensive technology, such as the use of manual grinders for grains, is appropriate in some places because it makes the best use of human, financial, and natural resources. A manual grinder can process 20 pounds of grain per hour, replacing the mortar and pestle, which in the same time can pound a maximum of only 3 pounds. The specific technology that is appropriate varies from situation to situation.

Answer to Question 2

A common concern about irradiation is that it might alter the nutritional value of a food. The World Health Organization, along with numerous other public health agencies, points out that nutrient losses, if any, are insignificant.

That's not to say, however, that irradiation poses no risks. One of the most troublesome is that the radioactive materials used in the irradiation process may put workers and communities at undue risk. However, as with any technology, the risk of irradiation must be weighed carefully against the benefits and risks of alternate technologies. Consider spices, which typically harbor high levels of pathogens. Often, manufacturers douse them with a toxic, explosive chemical called ethylene oxide to rid them of bacteria. Yet because of its toxic, explosive nature, ethylene oxide puts workers at risk, may pollute the air, and may leave residue on the spices. In fact, the gas, which was once used to sterilize medical supplies, has been deemed so dangerous that most manufacturers now use irradiation instead. (Cotton swabs, tampons, teething rings, and a number of other consumer goods are also sterilized via irradiation.) Recently, USDA authorized irradiation of meat already inspected by the agency and approved as safe for consumption. As a result, food companies now have the option of using irradiation on raw meat and meat products (for example, ground beef, frozen hamburger patties, or frozen poultry).

The World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the Food and Drug Administration, and numerous other agencies encourage the use of irradiation in the fight against foodborne disease and food loss, and some 40 countries have approved it for use. According to WHO, each year spoilage, insect infestation, and the like lead to losses of as much as 50 percent of the world's food supplylosses that could be eliminated with irradiation. What's more, the process may help prevent deaths resulting from foodborne illness.



Charlie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640

zhanghao

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316

 

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

A serious new warning has been established for pregnant women against taking ACE inhibitors during pregnancy. In the study, the risk of major birth defects in children whose mothers took ACE inhibitors during the first trimester was nearly three times higher than in children whose mothers didn't take ACE inhibitors. Physicians can prescribe alternative medications for pregnant women who have symptoms of high blood pressure.

Did you know?

Though the United States has largely rejected the metric system, it is used for currency, as in 100 pennies = 1 dollar. Previously, the British currency system was used, with measurements such as 12 pence to the shilling, and 20 shillings to the pound.

Did you know?

Interferon was scarce and expensive until 1980, when the interferon gene was inserted into bacteria using recombinant DNA technology, allowing for mass cultivation and purification from bacterial cultures.

Did you know?

Approximately 500,000 babies are born each year in the United States to teenage mothers.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library