The 2 + 2 = 4 approach A) generally works only with lengthy, ...

[go.lag]

The 2 + 2 = 4 approach
 
  A) generally works only with lengthy, non-routine reports.
  B) convinces the reader by demonstrating that everything adds up.
  C) is far more complicated than any other organizational strategy.
  D) is the only approach that is appropriate for any business report.
  E) works best if the reader is likely to accept the argument.

Question 2

When defining the problems you need to address in an analytical report, ask yourself:
 
  A) How long should this report be?
  B) Why is this issue important?
  C) What is my purpose is writing this?
  D) Who will read the report?
  E) How can I use this report to gain credibility?

[matt]

Answer to Question 1

Answer: B
Explanation: B) In the 2 + 2 = 4 approach, your goal is to show how everything adds up to a single conclusion or plan of action. If this approach seems like it can work, it is the first thing to try when you need a logical argument strategy.

Answer to Question 2

Answer: B
Explanation: B) You can clarify the problem in an analytical report by determining what you need to analyze, why the issue is important, who is involved, where the trouble is located, and how and when it started.

[go.lag]

Thank you

[matt]

No problemo