Author Question: If an employer knows that a specific standard will not protect its workers against a particular ... (Read 52 times)

HudsonKB16

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 535
If an employer knows that a specific standard will not protect its workers against a particular hazard but can prove that it is in full compliance with the specific standard, can the employer be held to be in violation of the general duty clause?

Question 2

Which of these does the NLRA not protect?
 a. Right to form a union.
  b. Right to picket.
  c. Right to strike.
  d. Right to block nonunion workers from company property.
  e. Right to bargain collectively.



ynlevi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 338
Answer to Question 1

Yes. The employer may still be held to be in violation of Section 5(a)(1) of the OSHAthe general duty clause. The Court stated, If an employer knows that a specific standard will not protect his workers against a particular hazard, his duty under Section 5(a)(1) will not be discharged no matter how faithfully he observes that standard..

Answer to Question 2

.D



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Long-term mental and physical effects from substance abuse include: paranoia, psychosis, immune deficiencies, and organ damage.

Did you know?

Most women experience menopause in their 50s. However, in 1994, an Italian woman gave birth to a baby boy when she was 61 years old.

Did you know?

Human neurons are so small that they require a microscope in order to be seen. However, some neurons can be up to 3 feet long, such as those that extend from the spinal cord to the toes.

Did you know?

In ancient Rome, many of the richer people in the population had lead-induced gout. The reason for this is unclear. Lead poisoning has also been linked to madness.

Did you know?

Asthma cases in Americans are about 75% higher today than they were in 1980.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library