Did the FLRA abuse its discretion in this ...

[urbanoutfitters]

Did the FLRA abuse its discretion in this case?

Question 2

CPA QUESTION: Unger owes a total of 50,000 to eight unsecured creditors and one fully secured creditor. Quincy is one of the unsecured creditors and is owed 6,000 . Quincy has filed a petition against Unger under the liquidation provisions of Chapter 7 of the federal Bankruptcy Code. Unger has been unable to pay debts as they become due. Unger's liabilities exceed Unger's assets. Unger has filed papers opposing the bankruptcy petition. Which of the following statements regarding Quincy's petition is correct?
 a. It will be dismissed because the secured creditor failed to join in the filing of the petition.
  b. It will be dismissed because three unsecured creditors must join in the filing of the petition.
  c. It will be granted because Unger's liabilities exceed Unger's assets.
  d. It will be granted because Unger is unable to pay Unger's debts as they become due.

[sarah_brady415]

Answer to Question 1

No. The court stated that it had little trouble deciding that the FLRA did not abuse its discretion in this case, where the union repeatedly violated legal prohibitions against strikes and other job actions, participated in job actions after the issuance of injunctions and restraining orders, and defiantly participated in a willful and intentional strike. If the extreme remedy that Congress enacted cannot properly be applied to this case, the court doubted that it could ever properly be invoked..

Answer to Question 2

.D