This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Employee versus Independent Contractor. L.M.T. Steel Products, Inc, contracted with a school to ... (Read 189 times)

tsand2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 520
Employee versus Independent Contractor. L.M.T. Steel Products, Inc, contracted with a school to install numerous room partitions. To accomplish this work, L.M.T. hired a man named Webster. Webster was not a regular employee of L.M.T., and it was stipulated that he was to be paid by the number of feet of partitions installed. Webster did not have a contractor's license. He hired other workers to do the installing, and these workers were paid by L.M.T. Webster was given blueprints by L.M.T., but he was not otherwise at any time actively supervised by L.M.T. on the job. Needing to place a telephone call to L.M.T., Webster drove his own personal vehicle to a public telephone. On the way, he negligently collided with another car, and an occupant of that car, Peirson, was injured. Peirson sued L.M.T., claiming that Webster was an employee. L.M.T. claimed that Webster was an independent contractor. Who was correct? Explain.

Question 2

A principal may designate someone to do all acts that can be legally delegated to an agent. That agent is called a universal agent.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ilianabrrr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
Answer to Question 1

Employee versus independent contractor
Peirson is correct. The court found Webster to be an employee of L.M.T. and not an inde-pendent contractor. The court held that one of the most significant factors in determining whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor is the employer's right to control the individual's work performance. It is not the manner in whichor how frequentlyan employer exercises this right but simply that the employer has the right to do so. In this situation, the jury found that Webster was hired as a foreman, and although Webster hired the other installers, these installers were paid by L.M.T. and were therefore employees of L.M.T. Based on these facts, the court found that L.M.T. had the right to control Webster's job performance as an employee of L.M.T.

Answer to Question 2

TRUE




tsand2

  • Member
  • Posts: 520
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Gracias!


Perkypinki

  • Member
  • Posts: 339
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

Most strokes are caused when blood clots move to a blood vessel in the brain and block blood flow to that area. Thrombolytic therapy can be used to dissolve the clot quickly. If given within 3 hours of the first stroke symptoms, this therapy can help limit stroke damage and disability.

Did you know?

A headache when you wake up in the morning is indicative of sinusitis. Other symptoms of sinusitis can include fever, weakness, tiredness, a cough that may be more severe at night, and a runny nose or nasal congestion.

Did you know?

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or MRSA was discovered in 1961 in the United Kingdom. It if often referred to as a superbug. MRSA infections cause more deaths in the United States every year than AIDS.

Methicilli ...
Did you know?

Atropine was named after the Greek goddess Atropos, the oldest and ugliest of the three sisters known as the Fates, who controlled the destiny of men.

Did you know?

In most cases, kidneys can recover from almost complete loss of function, such as in acute kidney (renal) failure.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library