Author Question: In Weyerhaeuser v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber, where Weyerhaeuser was accused of predatory bidding ... (Read 48 times)

rosent76 · **on:** Jun 24, 2018

In Weyerhaeuser v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber, where Weyerhaeuser was accused of predatory bidding for raw timber to drive out a competitor, the Supreme Court held Weyerhaeuser was:
a. not guilty because predatory bidding does not the violate Robinson-Patman Act, predatory pricing does b. not guilty because it was found to be paying the going market price
c. guilty as its market share increased to 65 percent, which was evidence of monopolistic impact d. guilty as it raised prices of output after it drove out the competition by buying most of the inputs e. none of the other choices

Question 2

In EEOC v. Dial Corp, where an employer used a test of strength to screen job applicants for ability to do the job, the appeals court held that the test was not a valid way to select employees and served to discriminate against women.
a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false