Congress may burden interstate commerce while states:
a. may also burden interstate commerce
b. may not burden interstate commerce unless allowed by Congress c. may only burden interstate, but not intrastate, commerce
d. may burden interstate commerce in the interest of increasing intrastate commerce e. none of the other choices are correct
Question 2
South-Central Timber Development v. Wunnicke, concerning federal and state regulation of Alaska timber processing, shows that:
a. Congress may limit interstate commerce however it wishes
b. Congress may limit interstate commerce only with approval of the affected states
c. Congress may not regulate intrastate commerce, if the effect is inherently uncompetitive d. Congress may burden interstate commerce, but states may not unless allowed by Congress
e. States may place substantial burdens on interstate commerce so long as it advances a significant state interest
This painting depicts New Orleans in 1803, when the city was acquired—along with much of the modern
Andrea Bowers, United States v. Tim DeChristopher.
Gonorrhea Rates in the United States
Globalization Within the United States
An example of the sometimes drastic differences in placarding regulations in the United States ...
Major events in the storage, retrieval, and use of fuels in the fed and unfed states