This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Explain why a federal statute that permits federal suits against defendants who have committed ... (Read 58 times)

joblessjake

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 555
Explain why a federal statute that permits federal suits against defendants who have committed crimes against women is unconstitutional while civil rights laws are considered constitutional.

Question 2

The Export Trading Company Act of 1982:
 A) permits combinations of U.S. firms for purposes of international competition.
 B) is part of NAFTA.
 C) is under judicial challenge by the Justice Department.
 D) is a tariff provision in the U.S.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

af

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 356
Answer to Question 1

The underlying economic distinction is critical. The civil rights issues address economic activity such as restaurants and hotels and their impact on interstate commerce. The crimes against women are non-economic based.

Answer to Question 2

A




joblessjake

  • Member
  • Posts: 555
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


chjcharjto14

  • Member
  • Posts: 342
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Pubic lice (crabs) are usually spread through sexual contact. You cannot catch them by using a public toilet.

Did you know?

Russia has the highest death rate from cardiovascular disease followed by the Ukraine, Romania, Hungary, and Poland.

Did you know?

The human body produces and destroys 15 million blood cells every second.

Did you know?

The first-known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used in Egypt in 2000 BC. Condoms were also reportedly used, made of animal bladders or intestines.

Did you know?

In the United States, there is a birth every 8 seconds, according to the U.S. Census Bureau's Population Clock.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library