Wright Company contracted with the city of St. Louis to train and employ disadvantaged youths. If Wright fails to fulfill the contract and is sued by one of the disadvantaged youths, the youth would
A) win, as he is an intended beneficiary.
B) win, as he is a donor beneficiary.
C) lose, as he is a creditor beneficiary.
D) lose, as he is an incidental beneficiary.
Question 2
Which statement most accurately describes third party beneficiary rights?
A) A beneficiary may enforce a contract if the parties intended to benefit him and if enforcing the promise will satisfy a duty of the promisee to the beneficiary.
B) If a promisee intended to make a gift to the beneficiary, the beneficiary may not enforce the contract.
C) An intended third party beneficiary has no enforceable rights in a contract.
D) Incidental beneficiaries have enforceable rights against both contracting parties.
Cao Fei, RMB City, in Art in the Twenty-First Century, season 5 episode, "Fantasy".
Russel Wright, American Modern dinnerware.
Working and Living and Playing in the City Dump of Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Working and Living and Playing in the City Dump of Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Working and Living and Playing in the City Dump of Phnom Penh, Cambodia
A company that sells sweatshirts finds that the profit can be modelled by P(s)= ...