Wright Company contracted with the city of St. Louis to train and employ disadvantaged youths. If Wright fails to fulfill the contract and is sued by one of the disadvantaged youths, the youth would
A) win, as he is an intended beneficiary.
B) win, as he is a donor beneficiary.
C) lose, as he is a creditor beneficiary.
D) lose, as he is an incidental beneficiary.
Question 2
Which statement most accurately describes third party beneficiary rights?
A) A beneficiary may enforce a contract if the parties intended to benefit him and if enforcing the promise will satisfy a duty of the promisee to the beneficiary.
B) If a promisee intended to make a gift to the beneficiary, the beneficiary may not enforce the contract.
C) An intended third party beneficiary has no enforceable rights in a contract.
D) Incidental beneficiaries have enforceable rights against both contracting parties.
Louis Agassiz
Morris and Company, Sussex Rush-Seated Chairs.
Working and Living and Playing in the City Dump of Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Working and Living and Playing in the City Dump of Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Helgeson Company has identified the following items for possible inclusion when taking a ...