What is the best evaluation of this argument? A university was saved from financial and academic disaster by its provost, who later went on to become a consultant
James Hoopster became a consultant after having served as a provost. So James Hoopster saved his university from financial and academic disaster.
(a) It is a valid inference.
(b) It is invalid because we do not know what a provost is.
(c) It is invalid because we do now know when Hoopster was a provost.
(d) It is invalid because we cannot be sure if we are referring to the same provost.
(e) It is invalid because the dean saved the university from financial and academic disaster.
Question 2
If a person is a strong critical thinker, then he must also be an ethical person.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Laboratory, Institute of Biochemistry, University of Cologne.
Blue whale skeleton, outside the Long Marine Laboratory at the University of California, Santa Cruz
Critical thinking and the evaluation process
Critical thinking model for safety evaluation
J. P. Morgan, the financial genius, staved off ruinous competition among steel firms by combining mo
Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Exercise Science