What is the best evaluation of this argument? A university was saved from financial and academic disaster by its provost, who later went on to become a consultant
James Hoopster became a consultant after having served as a provost. So James Hoopster saved his university from financial and academic disaster.
(a) It is a valid inference.
(b) It is invalid because we do not know what a provost is.
(c) It is invalid because we do now know when Hoopster was a provost.
(d) It is invalid because we cannot be sure if we are referring to the same provost.
(e) It is invalid because the dean saved the university from financial and academic disaster.
Question 2
If a person is a strong critical thinker, then he must also be an ethical person.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Critical thinking model for safety evaluation
Ethnic Differences in Financial Support for College Based on a sample of 304 emerging adults aged 2
Major Findings of the High Scope Preschool Study High Scope participants showed better academic per
Robert K. Merton (1910–2003), who spent most of his academic career at Columbia University, was a ...
Evaluation of gait
Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Exercise Science