What is the best evaluation of this argument? A university was saved from financial and academic disaster by its provost, who later went on to become a consultant
James Hoopster became a consultant after having served as a provost. So James Hoopster saved his university from financial and academic disaster.
(a) It is a valid inference.
(b) It is invalid because we do not know what a provost is.
(c) It is invalid because we do now know when Hoopster was a provost.
(d) It is invalid because we cannot be sure if we are referring to the same provost.
(e) It is invalid because the dean saved the university from financial and academic disaster.
Question 2
If a person is a strong critical thinker, then he must also be an ethical person.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Multiple sclerosis (MS). (a) A disease characterized by the gradual development of small areas of ha
Major Findings of the High Scope Preschool Study High Scope participants showed better academic per
Preparing a Urine Specimen for Microscopic Examination (for Classroom Evaluation Only)
Evaluation of light touch
Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Prove the argument using two column proof number 5 only