If the current molecular evidence regarding animal origins is well-substantiated in the future, then what will be true of any contrary evidence regarding the origin of animals derived from the fossil record?
A) The contrary fossil evidence will be seen as a hoax.
B) The fossil evidence will be understood to have been incorrect because it is incomplete.
C) The fossil record will henceforth be ignored.
D) Phylogenies involving even the smallest bit of fossil evidence will need to be discarded.
E) Only phylogenies based solely on fossil evidence will need to be discarded.
A revised animal phylogeny based on molecular data of SSU rRNA
Relationships and dates divergence of living primate group based on molecular and DNA comparisons.
Common skin signs are often evidence of an illness or disorder. A nodule is a larger papule; acne ...
Geographical Origins of U.S. Latinos
Sexual assault evidence collection kit.
Figure of a Woman with a Drawing Showing Evidence of Original Painting and Outlining Design Scheme