If the current molecular evidence regarding animal origins is well-substantiated in the future, then what will be true of any contrary evidence regarding the origin of animals derived from the fossil record?
A) The contrary fossil evidence will be seen as a hoax.
B) The fossil evidence will be understood to have been incorrect because it is incomplete.
C) The fossil record will henceforth be ignored.
D) Phylogenies involving even the smallest bit of fossil evidence will need to be discarded.
E) Only phylogenies based solely on fossil evidence will need to be discarded.
Evidence that the ATP synthase is a rotary machine
Common skin signs are often evidence of an illness or disorder. A fissure is a crack-like sore or ...
Bidirectional replication from several fixed origins (O) on a linear eukaryotic chromosome
Gulf Stream/North Atlantic Current
The major events in meiosis in an animal cell with metaphase
Evidence of lethal mutations in plants