This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: True experiments are ____________ to any correlational study. a. always superior b. never ... (Read 14 times)

bclement10

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 560
True experiments are ____________ to any correlational study.
 
  a. always superior
  b. never superior
  c. generally preferred
  d. equivalent to

Question 2

In most research studies, statistical techniques are used to rule out chance as a plausible explanation for the results. In single-subject research, how is chance (or coincidence) ruled out as a plausible explanation for the observed treatment effects?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

jessicaduplan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 337
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

In single-subject research, chance is ruled out by replicating the treatment effect. Although it is possible that chance or coincidence accounts for changes in behavior when the treatment is first introduced, it is very unlikely that chance will occur again a second, when the treatment is reintroduced.





 

Did you know?

The human body produces and destroys 15 million blood cells every second.

Did you know?

About 600,000 particles of skin are shed every hour by each human. If you live to age 70 years, you have shed 105 pounds of dead skin.

Did you know?

All adults should have their cholesterol levels checked once every 5 years. During 2009–2010, 69.4% of Americans age 20 and older reported having their cholesterol checked within the last five years.

Did you know?

Nearly 31 million adults in America have a total cholesterol level that is more than 240 mg per dL.

Did you know?

Throughout history, plants containing cardiac steroids have been used as heart drugs and as poisons (e.g., in arrows used in combat), emetics, and diuretics.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library