This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: True experiments are ____________ to any correlational study. a. always superior b. never ... (Read 48 times)

bclement10

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 560
True experiments are ____________ to any correlational study.
 
  a. always superior
  b. never superior
  c. generally preferred
  d. equivalent to

Question 2

In most research studies, statistical techniques are used to rule out chance as a plausible explanation for the results. In single-subject research, how is chance (or coincidence) ruled out as a plausible explanation for the observed treatment effects?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

jessicaduplan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 337
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

In single-subject research, chance is ruled out by replicating the treatment effect. Although it is possible that chance or coincidence accounts for changes in behavior when the treatment is first introduced, it is very unlikely that chance will occur again a second, when the treatment is reintroduced.





 

Did you know?

Bacteria have flourished on the earth for over three billion years. They were the first life forms on the planet.

Did you know?

Your heart beats over 36 million times a year.

Did you know?

Amphetamine poisoning can cause intravascular coagulation, circulatory collapse, rhabdomyolysis, ischemic colitis, acute psychosis, hyperthermia, respiratory distress syndrome, and pericarditis.

Did you know?

Sildenafil (Viagra®) has two actions that may be of consequence in patients with heart disease. It can lower the blood pressure, and it can interact with nitrates. It should never be used in patients who are taking nitrates.

Did you know?

Medication errors are three times higher among children and infants than with adults.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library