Author Question: Study results are in the opposite direction of the study prediction. What actions should be taken by ... (Read 33 times)

nautica902

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 591
Study results are in the opposite direction of the study prediction. What actions should be taken by the researcher? Standard Text: Select all that apply.
 
  1. Try to make sense of the findings.
  2. Give some explanation for the results.
  3. Make recommendations for further study.
  4. State that the null hypothesis is rejected.
  5. Report that the data are flawed and not significant.

Question 2

In the section on findings, the nurse researcher wrote, These results are highly generalizable to similar populations. How should a nurse reading this report interpret this statement? Standard Text: Select all that apply.
 
  1. The author is suggesting a valid use of the findings.
  2. Findings should not include personal opinion.
  3. The author should list statistical information to support this statement.
  4. This statement should be included in the conclusions section of the report.
  5. The author should not include personal interpretation in the study report.


aburgess

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 361
Answer to Question 1

1, 2, 3
Rationale 1: The researcher should try to make sense of any results that occur in a study. This situation is not what the researcher desired but may still provide valuable information.
Rationale 2: The researcher should attempt to explain the results and how they occurred.
Rationale 3: When unexpected results occur, a perfect opportunity exists to suggest additional research.
Rationale 4: In this case, the null hypothesis has not been rejected.
Rationale 5: Unless it is absolutely true that the data are flawed and insignificant, the researcher would not ethically make this statement.
Global Rationale:

Answer to Question 2

2, 4
Rationale 1: It is not possible to determine if this is a valid use of the findings.
Rationale 2: The findings section is limited to an objective report of study data. It should not include interpretation.
Rationale 3: If the author makes this statement, it should be supported by data; however, it should not be included at this point in the report.
Rationale 4: Interpretation of findings should be written in the conclusions section of the report.
Rationale 5: The author is responsible for interpreting and drawing conclusions from the study data.
Global Rationale:



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Anti-aging claims should not ever be believed. There is no supplement, medication, or any other substance that has been proven to slow or stop the aging process.

Did you know?

The immune system needs 9.5 hours of sleep in total darkness to recharge completely.

Did you know?

Fatal fungal infections may be able to resist newer antifungal drugs. Globally, fungal infections are often fatal due to the lack of access to multiple antifungals, which may be required to be utilized in combination. Single antifungals may not be enough to stop a fungal infection from causing the death of a patient.

Did you know?

The Food and Drug Administration has approved Risperdal, an adult antipsychotic drug, for the symptomatic treatment of irritability in children and adolescents with autism. The approval is the first for the use of a drug to treat behaviors associated with autism in children. These behaviors are included under the general heading of irritability and include aggression, deliberate self-injury, and temper tantrums.

Did you know?

The newest statin drug, rosuvastatin, has been called a superstatin because it appears to reduce LDL cholesterol to a greater degree than the other approved statin drugs.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library