Author Question: Study results are in the opposite direction of the study prediction. What actions should be taken by ... (Read 71 times)

nautica902

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 591
Study results are in the opposite direction of the study prediction. What actions should be taken by the researcher? Standard Text: Select all that apply.
 
  1. Try to make sense of the findings.
  2. Give some explanation for the results.
  3. Make recommendations for further study.
  4. State that the null hypothesis is rejected.
  5. Report that the data are flawed and not significant.

Question 2

In the section on findings, the nurse researcher wrote, These results are highly generalizable to similar populations. How should a nurse reading this report interpret this statement? Standard Text: Select all that apply.
 
  1. The author is suggesting a valid use of the findings.
  2. Findings should not include personal opinion.
  3. The author should list statistical information to support this statement.
  4. This statement should be included in the conclusions section of the report.
  5. The author should not include personal interpretation in the study report.


aburgess

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 361
Answer to Question 1

1, 2, 3
Rationale 1: The researcher should try to make sense of any results that occur in a study. This situation is not what the researcher desired but may still provide valuable information.
Rationale 2: The researcher should attempt to explain the results and how they occurred.
Rationale 3: When unexpected results occur, a perfect opportunity exists to suggest additional research.
Rationale 4: In this case, the null hypothesis has not been rejected.
Rationale 5: Unless it is absolutely true that the data are flawed and insignificant, the researcher would not ethically make this statement.
Global Rationale:

Answer to Question 2

2, 4
Rationale 1: It is not possible to determine if this is a valid use of the findings.
Rationale 2: The findings section is limited to an objective report of study data. It should not include interpretation.
Rationale 3: If the author makes this statement, it should be supported by data; however, it should not be included at this point in the report.
Rationale 4: Interpretation of findings should be written in the conclusions section of the report.
Rationale 5: The author is responsible for interpreting and drawing conclusions from the study data.
Global Rationale:



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

According to animal studies, the typical American diet is damaging to the liver and may result in allergies, low energy, digestive problems, and a lack of ability to detoxify harmful substances.

Did you know?

Asthma occurs in one in 11 children and in one in 12 adults. African Americans and Latinos have a higher risk for developing asthma than other groups.

Did you know?

As many as 28% of hospitalized patients requiring mechanical ventilators to help them breathe (for more than 48 hours) will develop ventilator-associated pneumonia. Current therapy involves intravenous antibiotics, but new antibiotics that can be inhaled (and more directly treat the infection) are being developed.

Did you know?

Cytomegalovirus affects nearly the same amount of newborns every year as Down syndrome.

Did you know?

The Food and Drug Administration has approved Risperdal, an adult antipsychotic drug, for the symptomatic treatment of irritability in children and adolescents with autism. The approval is the first for the use of a drug to treat behaviors associated with autism in children. These behaviors are included under the general heading of irritability and include aggression, deliberate self-injury, and temper tantrums.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library