Author Question: Which of the following is an example of a systematic review? A) An RCT study published in the ... (Read 30 times)

colton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
Which of the following is an example of a systematic review?
 
  A) An RCT study published in the journal Nursing Research
  B) A meta-analysis from the Cochrane database
  C) A synopsis published in Evidence-Based Nursing
  D) A clinical practice guideline from the National Guideline Clearinghouse

Question 2

Which statement most accurately describes the relationship between reliability and validity of a measurement instrument?
 
  1. A measure cannot be reliable unless it is valid.
  2. As reliability increases, validity decreases.
  3. A measure cannot be valid unless it is reliable.
  4. As validity increases reliability decreases.



kaylee05

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Answer to Question 1

B
Feedback:
A meta-analysis is a type of systematic review and a technique for integrating quantitative research findings statistically. In essence, meta-analysis treats the findings from a study as one piece of information. The findings from multiple studies on the same topic are combined and then all of the information is analyzed statistically in a manner similar to that in a usual study. Unlike systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines (which often are based on systematic reviews) give specific recommendations for evidence-based decision-making. Guideline development typically involves the consensus of a group of researchers, experts, and clinicians. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is an individual study that focuses on the effectiveness of therapies rather than on broader health-care interventions. Synopses, or summaries, of systematic reviews and of single studies are available in evidence-based abstract journals such as Evidence-Based Nursing.

Answer to Question 2

3
Rationale 1: The reliability of an instrument tells nothing about the degree of validity. An instrument can be very reliable, but have low validity.
Rationale 2: There is no evidence that increasing reliability decreases validity.
Rationale 3: Reliability of a measure is always considered first because reliability is a necessary condition for validity. An instrument cannot be valid unless it is reliable.
Rationale 4: There is no evidence that increasing validity decreases reliability.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Increased intake of vitamin D has been shown to reduce fractures up to 25% in older people.

Did you know?

In 1844, Charles Goodyear obtained the first patent for a rubber condom.

Did you know?

The use of salicylates dates back 2,500 years to Hippocrates's recommendation of willow bark (from which a salicylate is derived) as an aid to the pains of childbirth. However, overdosage of salicylates can harm body fluids, electrolytes, the CNS, the GI tract, the ears, the lungs, the blood, the liver, and the kidneys and cause coma or death.

Did you know?

If all the neurons in the human body were lined up, they would stretch more than 600 miles.

Did you know?

More than 150,000 Americans killed by cardiovascular disease are younger than the age of 65 years.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library