Author Question: Which of the following elections might likely have gone the other way if not for a split resulting ... (Read 87 times)

Bob-Dole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 547
Which of the following elections might likely have gone the other way if not for a split resulting in a factional party?
 
  A) 1800
  B) 1912
  C) 1948
  D) 1968
  E) 2008

Question 2

Elections based on a plurality system discourage new parties from forming because
 
  A) a plurality system discourages patronage and reduces voter interest in joining a party.
  B) a plurality system requires parties to form alliances with other parties to win elections.
  C) under this winner-take-all system, parties must be broadly based in order to gain alliances and support.
  D) a plurality system requires each party to be as narrowly based as possible, leaving little room for new parties.
  E) a plurality system gives an advantage to savvy political unknowns who can grab the media spotlight.



zhanghao

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

C



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Acetaminophen (Tylenol) in overdose can seriously damage the liver. It should never be taken by people who use alcohol heavily; it can result in severe liver damage and even a condition requiring a liver transplant.

Did you know?

Sildenafil (Viagra®) has two actions that may be of consequence in patients with heart disease. It can lower the blood pressure, and it can interact with nitrates. It should never be used in patients who are taking nitrates.

Did you know?

Approximately 70% of expectant mothers report experiencing some symptoms of morning sickness during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Did you know?

Alcohol acts as a diuretic. Eight ounces of water is needed to metabolize just 1 ounce of alcohol.

Did you know?

Your heart beats over 36 million times a year.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library