Author Question: Which of the following elections might likely have gone the other way if not for a split resulting ... (Read 61 times)

Bob-Dole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 547
Which of the following elections might likely have gone the other way if not for a split resulting in a factional party?
 
  A) 1800
  B) 1912
  C) 1948
  D) 1968
  E) 2008

Question 2

Elections based on a plurality system discourage new parties from forming because
 
  A) a plurality system discourages patronage and reduces voter interest in joining a party.
  B) a plurality system requires parties to form alliances with other parties to win elections.
  C) under this winner-take-all system, parties must be broadly based in order to gain alliances and support.
  D) a plurality system requires each party to be as narrowly based as possible, leaving little room for new parties.
  E) a plurality system gives an advantage to savvy political unknowns who can grab the media spotlight.



zhanghao

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

C



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The B-complex vitamins and vitamin C are not stored in the body and must be replaced each day.

Did you know?

There are 20 feet of blood vessels in each square inch of human skin.

Did you know?

Your heart beats over 36 million times a year.

Did you know?

The liver is the only organ that has the ability to regenerate itself after certain types of damage. As much as 25% of the liver can be removed, and it will still regenerate back to its original shape and size. However, the liver cannot regenerate after severe damage caused by alcohol.

Did you know?

More than 50% of American adults have oral herpes, which is commonly known as "cold sores" or "fever blisters." The herpes virus can be active on the skin surface without showing any signs or causing any symptoms.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library