In the case of Shaw v. Reno (1993), the Supreme Court ruled that
a. majority-minority districts were not a violation of the Thirteenth Amendment.
b. majority-minority districts were unconstitutional.
c. minority-dominated congressional districts were a violation of the Tenth Amendment.
d. minority-dominated congressional districts were not a violation of the Tenth Amendment.
e. redrawing voting district lines from time to time is constitutional.
Question 2
A majority-minority district is
a. a congressional district designed to include so many members of minority groups so that the opportunity for a minority candidate to be elected is greatly improved.
b. a congressional district designed to include so many members of majority groups so that the opportunity for a majority candidate to be elected is greatly improved.
c. a congressional district designed to make it very difficult for a minority candidate to avoid a run-off election.
d. a congressional district designed to make it very difficult for a majority candidate to avoid a run-off election.
e. a process of redrawing voting district lines from time to time and adjusting the number of representatives allotted each state.
In 2013, Americans learned that the federal government massively surveys their phone calls and e-mai
Mask of an iyoba (queen mother), probably Idia, Court of Benin, Nigeria.
This Russian godfather is leaving a Moscow court just after he was acquitted of a double murder. Do ...
A typical output driver. In this case, the PCM applies voltage to the fuel pump relay coil to ...
The breaking down of a sound—in this case, the sound of a clarinet—into its component sine waves ...
The family described in Example Case 5