[Answered] A beef steak has a bigger water footprint than a liter of beer. Indicate whether this statement ...

This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: A beef steak has a bigger water footprint than a liter of beer. Indicate whether this statement ... (Read 79 times)

Beheh

Hero Member
Posts: 520

on: Jul 14, 2018

A beef steak has a bigger water footprint than a liter of beer.

Indicate whether this statement is true or false.

Question 2

Desertification is most common in tropical and subtropical areas.

Indicate whether this statement is true or false.

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

mcinincha279

Sr. Member
Posts: 316

Reply #1 on: Jul 14, 2018

Answer to Question 1

FALSE

Answer to Question 2

FALSE

Beheh

Member
Posts: 520

Reply 2 on: Jul 14, 2018

Gracias!

at

Member
Posts: 359

Reply 3 on: Yesterday

Excellent

« previous next »

Did you know?

Despite claims by manufacturers, the supplement known as Ginkgo biloba was shown in a study of more than 3,000 participants to be ineffective in reducing development of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in older people.

Did you know?

Certain rare plants containing cyanide include apricot pits and a type of potato called cassava. Fortunately, only chronic or massive ingestion of any of these plants can lead to serious poisoning.

Did you know?

Pope Sylvester II tried to introduce Arabic numbers into Europe between the years 999 and 1003, but their use did not catch on for a few more centuries, and Roman numerals continued to be the primary number system.

Did you know?

Once thought to have neurofibromatosis, Joseph Merrick (also known as "the elephant man") is now, in retrospect, thought by clinical experts to have had Proteus syndrome. This endocrine disease causes continued and abnormal growth of the bones, muscles, skin, and so on and can become completely debilitating with severe deformities occurring anywhere on the body.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.