This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Random assignment of participants to conditions has the advantage over other methods of assignment ... (Read 159 times)

littleanan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 575
Random assignment of participants to conditions has the advantage over other methods of assignment in that:
 
  a. it places equal numbers of participants in each group.
  b. it ensures that each condition precedes and follows every other condition equally often.
  c. it controls for known confounding variables.
  d. it controls for both known and unknown confounding variables.

Question 2

If you are at the point where you are deciding who from the population shall be your participants, you should be using:
 
  a. factorial design.
  b. random assignment.
  c. Solomon's four-group design.
  d. random sampling.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

morrie123456

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 314
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

D




littleanan

  • Member
  • Posts: 575
Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018
Excellent


shailee

  • Member
  • Posts: 392
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

Not getting enough sleep can greatly weaken the immune system. Lack of sleep makes you more likely to catch a cold, or more difficult to fight off an infection.

Did you know?

In ancient Rome, many of the richer people in the population had lead-induced gout. The reason for this is unclear. Lead poisoning has also been linked to madness.

Did you know?

You should not take more than 1,000 mg of vitamin E per day. Doses above this amount increase the risk of bleeding problems that can lead to a stroke.

Did you know?

Prostaglandins were first isolated from human semen in Sweden in the 1930s. They were so named because the researcher thought that they came from the prostate gland. In fact, prostaglandins exist and are synthesized in almost every cell of the body.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library