Author Question: Is it more meaningful to find a significant difference with a relatively small sample size or with a ... (Read 68 times)

dmcintosh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 517
Is it more meaningful to find a significant difference with a relatively small sample size or with a relatively large sample size?
 
  a. It points to a more robust difference if you have a small sample size.
  b. It points to a more substantial difference if you have a large sample size.
  c. The two differences are equally substantial.
  d. We can't tell anything about the size of the effect from what is given here.

Question 2

If we have two related samples, the power of our test will
 
  a. increase as the correlation between the two samples increases.
  b. increase as the correlation between the two samples decreases.
  c. be at its maximum when the correlation is zero.
  d. The correlation is irrelevant.



joanwhite

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

A



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Long-term mental and physical effects from substance abuse include: paranoia, psychosis, immune deficiencies, and organ damage.

Did you know?

There are more nerve cells in one human brain than there are stars in the Milky Way.

Did you know?

There are more bacteria in your mouth than there are people in the world.

Did you know?

The FDA recognizes 118 routes of administration.

Did you know?

There are actually 60 minerals, 16 vitamins, 12 essential amino acids, and three essential fatty acids that your body needs every day.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library