Author Question: Is it more meaningful to find a significant difference with a relatively small sample size or with a ... (Read 106 times)

dmcintosh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 517
Is it more meaningful to find a significant difference with a relatively small sample size or with a relatively large sample size?
 
  a. It points to a more robust difference if you have a small sample size.
  b. It points to a more substantial difference if you have a large sample size.
  c. The two differences are equally substantial.
  d. We can't tell anything about the size of the effect from what is given here.

Question 2

If we have two related samples, the power of our test will
 
  a. increase as the correlation between the two samples increases.
  b. increase as the correlation between the two samples decreases.
  c. be at its maximum when the correlation is zero.
  d. The correlation is irrelevant.



joanwhite

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

A



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Malaria was not eliminated in the United States until 1951. The term eliminated means that no new cases arise in a country for 3 years.

Did you know?

Illicit drug use costs the United States approximately $181 billion every year.

Did you know?

The human body produces and destroys 15 million blood cells every second.

Did you know?

The Babylonians wrote numbers in a system that used 60 as the base value rather than the number 10. They did not have a symbol for "zero."

Did you know?

Inotropic therapy does not have a role in the treatment of most heart failure patients. These drugs can make patients feel and function better but usually do not lengthen the predicted length of their lives.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library