This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: It is possible that life exists on orphan planets, even though they do not orbit a star. Indicate ... (Read 80 times)

jerry coleman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
It is possible that life exists on orphan planets, even though they do not orbit a star.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Briefly explain why we think white-dwarf supernovae are useful for measuring cosmic distances.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

durant1234

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 338
Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

They all come from explosions of white dwarfs that reach the white-dwarf limit, so we expect them all to have the same luminosity; observations of white-dwarf supernovae for which we can measure distance independently confirm that they all have the same luminosity. Since we can assume we know their luminosity, we can use their apparent brightnesses to determine distance from the luminosity-distance formula.




jerry coleman

  • Member
  • Posts: 570
Reply 2 on: Jul 27, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


tandmlomax84

  • Member
  • Posts: 323
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

Vaccines cause herd immunity. If the majority of people in a community have been vaccinated against a disease, an unvaccinated person is less likely to get the disease since others are less likely to become sick from it and spread the disease.

Did you know?

There are more bacteria in your mouth than there are people in the world.

Did you know?

Bacteria have been found alive in a lake buried one half mile under ice in Antarctica.

Did you know?

There are actually 60 minerals, 16 vitamins, 12 essential amino acids, and three essential fatty acids that your body needs every day.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library