This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Donald is arguing that he doesn't need to have sub-goals in his project. What could you say to him ... (Read 28 times)

torybrooks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 500
Donald is arguing that he doesn't need to have sub-goals in his project. What could you say to him to make him change his mind?
 
  a. Sub-goals are just smaller parts that will lead you to your achieve your goal
  b. Sub-goals are attainable while the final goal may not be at the start
  c. Achieving sub-goals will increase your self-efficacy
  d. All of these should change his mind.

Question 2

Willa wants to do her problem behavior right now, but knows she will regret it later. According to the text, this can be seen as:
 
  a. a personality defect.
  b. a conflict between id and society.
  c. a conflict between herself and her conscience.
  d. a conflict between long- and short-term goals.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

heyhey123

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 353
Answer to Question 1

D.

Answer to Question 2

D.




torybrooks

  • Member
  • Posts: 500
Reply 2 on: Jun 21, 2018
Excellent


vickyvicksss

  • Member
  • Posts: 351
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

Long-term mental and physical effects from substance abuse include: paranoia, psychosis, immune deficiencies, and organ damage.

Did you know?

Eating food that has been cooked with poppy seeds may cause you to fail a drug screening test, because the seeds contain enough opiate alkaloids to register as a positive.

Did you know?

The first war in which wide-scale use of anesthetics occurred was the Civil War, and 80% of all wounds were in the extremities.

Did you know?

The effects of organophosphate poisoning are referred to by using the abbreviations “SLUD” or “SLUDGE,” It stands for: salivation, lacrimation, urination, defecation, GI upset, and emesis.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library