This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: An omission to act cannot be the proximate cause of an injury even if it had been foreseen. ... (Read 13 times)

Bob-Dole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 547
An omission to act cannot be the proximate cause of an injury even if it had been foreseen.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true(T) or false(F).

Question 2

Criminal acts of a third party do not attach, for negligence purposes, to a defendant unless a special relationship is shown to exist between either third party and defendant or third party and injured party.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true(T) or false(F).



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Pswine

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

F

Answer to Question 2

T





 

Did you know?

The average adult has about 21 square feet of skin.

Did you know?

Approximately one in four people diagnosed with diabetes will develop foot problems. Of these, about one-third will require lower extremity amputation.

Did you know?

Atropine, along with scopolamine and hyoscyamine, is found in the Datura stramonium plant, which gives hallucinogenic effects and is also known as locoweed.

Did you know?

Vampire bats have a natural anticoagulant in their saliva that permits continuous bleeding after they painlessly open a wound with their incisors. This capillary blood does not cause any significant blood loss to their victims.

Did you know?

The familiar sounds of your heart are made by the heart's valves as they open and close.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library