This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: An omission to act cannot be the proximate cause of an injury even if it had been foreseen. ... (Read 14 times)

Bob-Dole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 547
An omission to act cannot be the proximate cause of an injury even if it had been foreseen.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true(T) or false(F).

Question 2

Criminal acts of a third party do not attach, for negligence purposes, to a defendant unless a special relationship is shown to exist between either third party and defendant or third party and injured party.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true(T) or false(F).



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Pswine

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

F

Answer to Question 2

T





 

Did you know?

Despite claims by manufacturers, the supplement known as Ginkgo biloba was shown in a study of more than 3,000 participants to be ineffective in reducing development of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in older people.

Did you know?

If you could remove all of your skin, it would weigh up to 5 pounds.

Did you know?

There are over 65,000 known species of protozoa. About 10,000 species are parasitic.

Did you know?

Immunoglobulin injections may give short-term protection against, or reduce severity of certain diseases. They help people who have an inherited problem making their own antibodies, or those who are having certain types of cancer treatments.

Did you know?

Today, nearly 8 out of 10 pregnant women living with HIV (about 1.1 million), receive antiretrovirals.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library