This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule ... (Read 40 times)

asd123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule is in violation of the exclusionary rule, even if officers have a valid warrant to search a home.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

McCleskey v. Kemp (1987) considered whether _______ evidence was sufficient to demonstrate the presence of racial discrimination in the application of the death penalty.
 
  Fill in the blank(s) with correct word



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

kjohnson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Answer to Question 1

FALSE

Answer to Question 2

statistical





 

Did you know?

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or MRSA was discovered in 1961 in the United Kingdom. It if often referred to as a superbug. MRSA infections cause more deaths in the United States every year than AIDS.

Methicilli ...
Did you know?

Oxytocin is recommended only for pregnancies that have a medical reason for inducing labor (such as eclampsia) and is not recommended for elective procedures or for making the birthing process more convenient.

Did you know?

Essential fatty acids have been shown to be effective against ulcers, asthma, dental cavities, and skin disorders such as acne.

Did you know?

The first war in which wide-scale use of anesthetics occurred was the Civil War, and 80% of all wounds were in the extremities.

Did you know?

The first oral chemotherapy drug for colon cancer was approved by FDA in 2001.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library