This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule ... (Read 87 times)

asd123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule is in violation of the exclusionary rule, even if officers have a valid warrant to search a home.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

McCleskey v. Kemp (1987) considered whether _______ evidence was sufficient to demonstrate the presence of racial discrimination in the application of the death penalty.
 
  Fill in the blank(s) with correct word



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

kjohnson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Answer to Question 1

FALSE

Answer to Question 2

statistical





 

Did you know?

In most cases, kidneys can recover from almost complete loss of function, such as in acute kidney (renal) failure.

Did you know?

Oxytocin is recommended only for pregnancies that have a medical reason for inducing labor (such as eclampsia) and is not recommended for elective procedures or for making the birthing process more convenient.

Did you know?

Malaria was not eliminated in the United States until 1951. The term eliminated means that no new cases arise in a country for 3 years.

Did you know?

People with alcoholism are at a much greater risk of malnutrition than are other people and usually exhibit low levels of most vitamins (especially folic acid). This is because alcohol often takes the place of 50% of their daily intake of calories, with little nutritional value contained in it.

Did you know?

Medication errors are more common among seriously ill patients than with those with minor conditions.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library