This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Horton v. California (1990) is the case that removed the requirement of inadvertence from the plain ... (Read 40 times)

haleyc112

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
Horton v. California (1990) is the case that removed the requirement of inadvertence from the plain view doctrine.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Inadvertence is a new requirement for the plain view doctrine.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

hugthug12

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

FALSE




haleyc112

  • Member
  • Posts: 600
Reply 2 on: Aug 13, 2018
:D TYSM


sultansheikh

  • Member
  • Posts: 335
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

Vampire bats have a natural anticoagulant in their saliva that permits continuous bleeding after they painlessly open a wound with their incisors. This capillary blood does not cause any significant blood loss to their victims.

Did you know?

By definition, when a medication is administered intravenously, its bioavailability is 100%.

Did you know?

Nitroglycerin is used to alleviate various heart-related conditions, and it is also the chief component of dynamite (but mixed in a solid clay base to stabilize it).

Did you know?

Oxytocin is recommended only for pregnancies that have a medical reason for inducing labor (such as eclampsia) and is not recommended for elective procedures or for making the birthing process more convenient.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library