This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Horton v. California (1990) is the case that removed the requirement of inadvertence from the plain ... (Read 55 times)

haleyc112

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
Horton v. California (1990) is the case that removed the requirement of inadvertence from the plain view doctrine.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Inadvertence is a new requirement for the plain view doctrine.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

hugthug12

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

FALSE




haleyc112

  • Member
  • Posts: 600
Reply 2 on: Aug 13, 2018
Wow, this really help


Laurenleakan

  • Member
  • Posts: 309
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

Did you know?

The U.S. Pharmacopeia Medication Errors Reporting Program states that approximately 50% of all medication errors involve insulin.

Did you know?

There are 20 feet of blood vessels in each square inch of human skin.

Did you know?

There are 60,000 miles of blood vessels in every adult human.

Did you know?

Approximately 500,000 babies are born each year in the United States to teenage mothers.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library