Author Question: In Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), the Court held that a state capital sentencing procedure ... (Read 55 times)

Alygatorr01285

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
In Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), the Court held that a state capital sentencing procedure that permitted the sentencing judge to make the factual determination of the aggravating and mitigating circumstances present
 
  a. violated the Sixth Amendment's right of trial by jury
  b. violated the Sixth Amendment's right of trial by judge
  c. violated the Sixth Amendment's right to a speedy trial
  d. violated the Eight Amendment's right to freedom from cruel and unusual punishment

Question 2

Reentry has been described as a transient state between liberty and recommitment..
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



BUTTHOL369

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

TRUE



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Asthma cases in Americans are about 75% higher today than they were in 1980.

Did you know?

Automated pill dispensing systems have alarms to alert patients when the correct dosing time has arrived. Most systems work with many varieties of medications, so patients who are taking a variety of drugs can still be in control of their dose regimen.

Did you know?

In 1886, William Bates reported on the discovery of a substance produced by the adrenal gland that turned out to be epinephrine (adrenaline). In 1904, this drug was first artificially synthesized by Friedrich Stolz.

Did you know?

On average, someone in the United States has a stroke about every 40 seconds. This is about 795,000 people per year.

Did you know?

No drugs are available to relieve parathyroid disease. Parathyroid disease is caused by a parathyroid tumor, and it needs to be removed by surgery.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library