Author Question: In which case did the Court rule that probationers were entitled to an attorney during the ... (Read 64 times)

waynest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
In which case did the Court rule that probationers were entitled to an attorney during the revocation process?
 
  a. Morrisey v. Brewer
  b. Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  c. Minnesota v. Murphy
  d. Mempa v. Rhay

Question 2

Peter believes that his crime was justified because his girlfriend deceived him when she told him she was 19 . What legal justification defense does Peter possibly have?
 
  a. duress
  b. entrapment
  c. necessity
  d. none of these



rachel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

d



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Alcohol acts as a diuretic. Eight ounces of water is needed to metabolize just 1 ounce of alcohol.

Did you know?

If all the neurons in the human body were lined up, they would stretch more than 600 miles.

Did you know?

Russia has the highest death rate from cardiovascular disease followed by the Ukraine, Romania, Hungary, and Poland.

Did you know?

Green tea is able to stop the scent of garlic or onion from causing bad breath.

Did you know?

According to research, pregnant women tend to eat more if carrying a baby boy. Male fetuses may secrete a chemical that stimulates their mothers to step up her energy intake.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library