Based on the Canadian Psychiatric Association's (2004 ) position ...

[swpotter12]

Based on the Canadian Psychiatric Association's (2004 ) position in response to the Smith versus Jones case:
 
  a) Professionals do not have a duty to warn in cases which would breach confidentiality
  b) Duty to warn is an accepted standard of practice for psychiatrists even though it is not legally mandated in Canada
  c) Privileged communication supersedes duty to warn obligations in the United States in contrast to Canada in which duty to warn is legally established
  d) Duty to warn does not apply in cases where psychiatrists are retained as expert witnesses

Question 2

The Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists was developed:
 
  a) By American psychologists.
  b) Out of the American Psychological Association code of ethics.
  c) Because Canadian psychologists were concerned that the APA code of ethics was too lax with regard to dual relationships
  d) When the Canadian Psychological Association was founded

[apple]

Answer to Question 1

Right on time. Thanks a bunch.

Answer to Question 2

Posted another one can you check that one too? Thanks.

[swpotter12]

YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

[lcapri7]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it