This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Given Gordon Allport's (1954) description of the necessary preconditions for contact to reduce ... (Read 75 times)

scienceeasy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 565
Given Gordon Allport's (1954) description of the necessary preconditions for contact to reduce prejudice and conflict, why did desegregation efforts as originally enacted fail?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Consider the phrase, The exception proves the rule. How does this phrase reflect prejudicial attitudes in the face of evidence contrary to one's attitude?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Chou

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 335
Answer to Question 1

Answer: When groups have a history of conflict, contact alone is not enough; simply bringing different groups together in a classroom would not reduce prejudice or hostility, given a history of poor race relations in the United States. Groups need to be interdependent, and the traditional classroom fosters competition for teacher attention, not interdependence. The groups should have equal status; historically, minority students were under-prepared, so they did not have equal academic status with majority children. Contact should occur in an informal setting where in-group and out-group members can interact; in the traditional classroom, this is called talking to your neighbor, and is discouraged. Contact must occur with multiple members of the out-group. In classrooms in which there were one or a few minority children, this couldn't happen. Finally, norms must promote equality; classroom norms and individual grades do not promote equality, nor do teachers who themselves might be prejudiced.

Answer to Question 2

Answer: The idea that the exception proves the rule implies that when one finds a few examples to the contrary of a rule or stereotype, one indicates that these few examples are exceptions, rather than representative. In terms of prejudice and stereotypes, when someone encounters a few examples of people who exemplify traits that contradict a stereotype, they tend to dismiss that example as being an exception, rather than a rule, because it is schema-inconsistent information.




scienceeasy

  • Member
  • Posts: 565
Reply 2 on: Jun 22, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


tranoy

  • Member
  • Posts: 344
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

Persons who overdose with cardiac glycosides have a better chance of overall survival if they can survive the first 24 hours after the overdose.

Did you know?

It is believed that the Incas used anesthesia. Evidence supports the theory that shamans chewed cocoa leaves and drilled holes into the heads of patients (letting evil spirits escape), spitting into the wounds they made. The mixture of cocaine, saliva, and resin numbed the site enough to allow hours of drilling.

Did you know?

Illicit drug use costs the United States approximately $181 billion every year.

Did you know?

Lower drug doses for elderly patients should be used first, with titrations of the dose as tolerated to prevent unwanted drug-related pharmacodynamic effects.

Did you know?

Critical care patients are twice as likely to receive the wrong medication. Of these errors, 20% are life-threatening, and 42% require additional life-sustaining treatments.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library