Researchers have little ethical responsibility for how media or politicians might interpret their ...

Author Question: Researchers have little ethical responsibility for how media or politicians might interpret their ... (Read 87 times)

captainjonesify

Hero Member
Posts: 543

on: Jun 22, 2018

Researchers have little ethical responsibility for how media or politicians might interpret their research.

Indicate whether this statement is true or false.

Question 2

The risk of doing harm to participants in a research study can happen at any age.

Indicate whether this statement is true or false.

31809pancho

Sr. Member
Posts: 317

Reply #1 on: Jun 22, 2018

Answer to Question 1

False

Answer to Question 2

True

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

« previous next »

Did you know?

It is believed that the Incas used anesthesia. Evidence supports the theory that shamans chewed cocoa leaves and drilled holes into the heads of patients (letting evil spirits escape), spitting into the wounds they made. The mixture of cocaine, saliva, and resin numbed the site enough to allow hours of drilling.

Did you know?

According to the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, more than 50 million Americans have some kind of food allergy. Food allergies affect between 4 and 6% of children, and 4% of adults, according to the CDC. The most common food allergies include shellfish, peanuts, walnuts, fish, eggs, milk, and soy.

Did you know?

The newest statin drug, rosuvastatin, has been called a superstatin because it appears to reduce LDL cholesterol to a greater degree than the other approved statin drugs.

Did you know?

More than 20 million Americans cite use of marijuana within the past 30 days, according to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). More than 8 million admit to using it almost every day.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).